News
About Natalia
Games
Our Team
Articles
Gallery
Chess Links
Play Chess
Pogonina's Chess Shop
Advertise
Contact Us

Highlights

 Follow Natalia on Twitter:

http://www.pogonina.com/images//nat%20twit.jpg

 



Please help Natalia promote chess by making a donation:

 


 

Women's
chess live ratings

Link to Pogonina.com


Chess-DB

Journey to the Chess Kingdom

Top GM secrets revealed

Play chess at ChessOk

365Chess.com Biggest Online Chess Games Database




 
 
   More...


Polls
What's your FIDE rating?

What should Natalia do to make Pogonina.com more interesting for you?

Who is your favorite active top player?

Poker or chess: what do you like more?

What's the largest monetary chess prize you ever won?

How much time per day do you spend on chess-related activities?

Do you have a special chess mascot (pen, badge, toy, etc.)?

Which time control do you prefer for over-the-board tournaments?

The strongest women's chess team in the world is

What is the strongest national chess team in the world?

Will Magnus Carlsen's rating reach FIDE 2900?

Who will win the World Chess Championship Match-2014?

Customers and Nemeses

User Rating: / 1
PoorBest 
Written by Administrator   
Tuesday, 16 February 2010


by Natalia Pogonina for her
Chess.com Tuesday column


The transitivity law does not hold for chess. That is, if player A usually beats player B, and player B usually beats player C, it does not imply that player A usually beats player C. In fact, sometimes its quite the opposite.


While playing against some opponents of similar rating is a walk in the park (we call such players customers), some of our rivals pose an insurmountable barrier for us. For some reason be it chess style, psychology, or something  else they act as relentless nemeses, beating us over and over again.
 

kasparov2.jpg

Garry Kasparov: "Chess is mental torture."



Kasparov is a remarkable example of taking this paradigm to a new level. Like a bloodthirsty hawk, he tried his best to win all the encounters against his competitors and completely destroy their ego. Did he succeed? Lets take a look at some numbers from Megabase 2010.

Kasparov's results against some top chess players

Evgeny Bareev 15/18    +12    18 Games           83.33% (undefeated!)
Judit Polgar 14/17    +11    17 Games           82.35%
Michael Adams 17.5/24    +11    24 Games           79.92%
Boris Gelfand 16.5/21    +12    21 Games           78.57% (undefeated!)
Alexander Morosevich 8.5/11     +6      11 games   77.27% (undefeated!)
Alexei Shirov 24.5/32    +17    32 Games           76.56% (undefeated!)
Jan H Timman 40/58    +22    58 Games           68.97%
Nigel D Short 51/74    +28    74 Games           68.92%
Viktor Kortschnoj 27.5/40    +15    40 Games   68.75%
Veselin Topalov 27.5/42    +13    42 Games           65.48%
Viswanathan Anand 48.5/78    +19    78 Games   62.18%

This is outstanding: of these world champions and greatest GMs of all time only a few scored better than 30% against Garry!  As an illustration, this means that, roughly speaking, if World Champion Anand was to play Kasparov, he would be expected to score only 1 point out of 3! Sounds completely surreal, doesnt it?
 

aero12.jpg

Nadia (left) and Tania (right) - the Kosintseva sisters

As long as you have a lot of people to play with, you can simply avoid competing against your nemeses. However, the closer you are to the top, the less choice you have. For me the most bitter rivals have always been the Kosintseva sisters. Sometimes I would be ahead of them in terms of rating and tournaments results, sometimes vice versa. But I personally have always scored poorly against them. The09 Russian Superfinal was no exception. First I missed a win against Nadia in R4, then lost with White against Tania in R6. To give you the whole picture (this is in no way an excuse), I had to play that round with a strong fever, severe pain and after having hardly any sleep. In a few hours of game play, that took its toll.
 

P.S. Dethroning your bitter opponents feels very sweet. At Palma de Mallorca Interzonal, 1970 both Efim Geller and Bobby Fischer were leading the tournament. Efim had a +5 -2 =2 (!) score against Fischer, and decided to offer him a draw on move 7 with White. Fischer smiled and said: Too early!. Geller went red after losing the psychological battle, and simply blundered a pawn in a few moves. Thus Fischer taught us a lesson: that is the correct way of treating your nemeses! Wink
 

1962 Efim Geller vs Bobby Fischer Curacao .jpg  





Geller vs. Fischer in Curacao, 1962

Bookmark and Share




Comments (4)
1. Written by Andrey on 11:40 16 2010 .
 
 
Nice article, Natalia! 
 
Kasparov's killer instinct is remarkable indeed. 
 
It is very interesting also to know that you have such a 'relationship' with Nadezhda & Tatiana. :-) 
 
From outsider's perspective it is looking just as sisters' teamwork or 'revenge' of some sort :-))) Especially, if Tatiana is playing second :-)))
 
2. Written by on 13:39 16 2010 .
 
 
,
! ! ! ! - ! ! ! .
 
3. Written by on 16:46 18 2010 .
 
 
,
- () .=)
 
4. Written by on 20:58 26 2010 .
 
 
,
-
 

Write Comment
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:



Code:* Code

Last Updated ( Tuesday, 16 February 2010 )
 
< Prev   Next >