News
About Natalia
Games
Our Team
Articles
Gallery
Chess Links
Play Chess
Pogonina's Chess Shop
Advertise
Contact Us

Highlights

 Follow Natalia on Twitter:

http://www.pogonina.com/images//nat%20twit.jpg

 
Please help Natalia promote chess by making a donation:



 

Link to Pogonina.com

Play chess at ChessOk

365Chess.com Biggest Online Chess Games Database





Check qyto.jp for Japanese bitcoin casinos.

Here you can find Swedish sites without license, Spelkonto utan licens.

Find new casinos at the brand new Online Casinos XYZ site with reviews and ratings of the best gambling sites for UK players.

Play the popular King Kong Cash slot machine at Slot Strike, the new slot site for UK players.

Grab the chance to win big with a high RTP on the goonies slot progressive jackpot.

Goodluckmate.com - made an easier way to find Skrill casinos

Nettikasinot.media lists the best online casinos for Finnish gamblers. For more information visit: https://www.nettikasinot.media/suomalaiset-kasinot/  

Sweden is now a regulated market, which means that as a player you can only play at casinos with a license. See all regulated
casinos in Sweden by Mr casinova.

To find the best casino in Norway take look at
norske casino at CasinoPiloten.

Find the best Norwegian casinobonus at NyeCasinoNorge.org.

Get exclusive access to a
huge range of free spins & no deposit casino offers with Spin Bonus.

Try the exhilarating new 20p Roulette game.
Play it online at thecasinodb and find casinos to play for real money.

Get the best casino bonus information with Casino Gorilla.

Chess games at Gametop

CasinoAdvisers.com For you that want to find online casino strategies, guides and a good casino bonus!

 
   More...


Polls
What's your FIDE rating?

What should Natalia do to make Pogonina.com more interesting for you?

Who is your favorite active top player?

Poker or chess: what do you like more?

What's the largest monetary chess prize you ever won?

How much time per day do you spend on chess-related activities?

Do you have a special chess mascot (pen, badge, toy, etc.)?

Which time control do you prefer for over-the-board tournaments?

The strongest women's chess team in the world is

What is the strongest national chess team in the world?

Will Magnus Carlsen's rating reach FIDE 2900?

Do you think you can become a GM?

Choosing an Opening for the Game

User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 
Written by Administrator   
Tuesday, 09 August 2011


by Natalia Pogonina for her
Chess.com Tuesday column

The stronger the player, the more important it is that they know the opening well. The number of lines also increases tremendously. While beginners may get away with knowing just the basics, elite players have to analyze and memorize huge amounts of information.

There are two main types of opening preparation: having a narrow repertoire and a wide repertoire. In the first case you have a single response to the main moves by White (i.e. one opening against 1.e4, one against 1.d4, etc.). The pros of such approach are that you know your lines well and have a vast experience playing them. The cons: its very easy to prepare for a game against you; its hard to tune your tournament strategy in accordance with your performance. E.g. you may be playing a solid opening for Black, which doesnt help to win a decisive game at all.
 

A wide repertoire implies having a few lines up your sleeve (e.g. being able to play the KID, Gruenfeld and the Nimzoindian against 1.d4). Pros: flexible tournament strategy; opponents will have a hard time preparing. Cons: not enough experience; necessity to memorize enormous amounts of lines. The third approach is a hybrid of the first two: when you have one (or more) well-analyzed openings and can also choose something different in special cases. Pros: surprise effect. Cons: if you decide to improvise and play an opening from scratch, your knowledge of the system will likely be superficial, thus increasing the probability of making a mistake (or several!).

When choosing an opening for the game we should try to predict our opponents intentions, consider the tournament situation and find breaches in his preparation. If you know a line that more or less perfectly suits your goals, you can go ahead and play it. However, in the real world it often seems that something is wrong about your prep. Then you have to think of a different way. As a case study, lets consider my recent game against ex-Russian chess champion GM Sergey Volkov.
 

I had Black against him in round 4 of the Polugaevsky Memorial-2011. At this point I had 2.5/3, so my options werent limited to playing for a win only. By reviewing my opponents games, I discovered that against my main opening vs 1.d4, the Nimzovitch defense, he virtually always opts for a complicated line with 4.f3. He has a lot of experience treating those positions, while I cant boast the same. However, most of his opponents preferred 4d5 to my move 40-0. At first I was toying with the idea of employing my previous favorite the Benko gambit. Then I thought that I dont play it too often myself, and the opponent will probably prepare against it anyway, so it wont be much of a surprise factor. So, I decided to settle for the Nimzovitch defense and spent quite a lot of time analyzing an interesting line I found (later named by French GM Vladislav Tkachiev novelty of the week in the world). The advantage of this approach was that my opponent had never faced this idea before. Also, I reviewed the main variations thoroughly while preparing. The drawbacks were that in some variations a dangerous position could occur, and I wasnt sure I would be able to memorize all the prep well enough. Anyway, I knew that most experienced chess players try to avoid main lines when caught off guard, since they are scared of having to play against an opponent who has prepared the variation with a chess engine. Therefore, the risk was justified. 

 



As a result, the game proceeded just like I expected. My opponent deviated from a critical line, so I got a comfortable position. In fact, the opening was the main factor for a relatively successful outcome of the whole game. At some point my position was better, and I could even win a piece (although giving White a good compensation for it). Nonetheless, White didnt risk losing this game too much.

Bookmark and Share



Comments (3)
1. Written by This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it on 18:08 09 2011 .
 
 
I understand what saying know but i have a question in positions where you can transpose to another opening should you do it? why or why not. thank you
 
2. Written by Natalia on 18:23 09 2011 .
 
 
It depends on whether you like the idea of transposing or not. If you know the system to which you are going to transpose well, then why not. If you are not familiar with it and don't like the positions that occur in that system, then you probably shouldn't.
 
3. Written by This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it on 21:09 09 2011 .
 
 
Would it be to much to ask you to play online game sometime?
 

Write Comment
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:



Code:* Code

Last Updated ( Tuesday, 09 August 2011 )
 
< Prev   Next >