Material Imbalances |
Written by Administrator | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wednesday, 29 December 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
by Natalia Pogonina for her Chess.com Tuesday column From the very first steps in chess we learn the average value of the pieces. A queen is worth about two rooks, bishop and knight about 3 pawns. Of course, it is an approximation. Chess is a very complex game, so quite often imbalances occur. Three pawns may suddenly overcome a rook, two pieces beat a queen, and so on. One cannot rely on the standard values of the pieces only. The position plays a serious role too. All the above-mentioned refers not to short-terms tactics which lead to winning back the sacrificed material or mate, but to a long-term game with a material imbalance. The most typical cases of material imbalances are: When playing a position with a material imbalance, one should be especially careful since even a minor mistake may lead to a quick loss due to lack of material. One needs to approach the game creatively, not the way we look at normal positions. To learn how to treat such situations, one has to gain both practical experience and study remarkable games of chess masters. Also, it is important to feel when to go for a material imbalance, and not to be afraid of giving up material. In the game that I will share with you today my opponent, IM Anastasia Bodnaruk, has positionally sacrificed an exchange. The game was a roller-coaster. First I let the advantage slip away, then it was Nastyas turn to act likewise. Black had a comfortable and risk-free position after the sacrifice. White didnt have any open lines for operation, while Black could keep building up pressure. Nonetheless, my opponent lost her sense of the position, missed a draw a few times, and eventually lost. P.S. Merry Christmas & a Happy New Year!
Write Comment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 29 December 2010 ) |
< Prev | Next > |
---|