Sweden is now a regulated market, which means that as a player you can only play at casinos with a license. See all regulated casinos in Sweden by Mr casinova.
Everyone loves to know how they fare in chess as compared to others. The table below allows one to find out how many people of his/her official playing strength there are in the world:
Rating
Number of players
2800+
4 (Carlsen, Kasparov, Topalov, Anand)
2700-2799
35
2600-2699
181
2500-2599
691
2400-2499
2 094
2300-2399
5 408
2200-2299
13 003
2100-2199
19 965
2000-2099
23 798
1900-1999
19 211
1800-1899
15 054
1700-1799
10 746
1600-1699
6 721
1500-1599
3 688
1400-1499
1 671
1300-1399
426
1200-1299
108
Another interesting conclusion that jumps to the mind is that FIDE and club players seem not to get along well. While at 2800-2000 level the numbers keep growing as we go down the pyramid (it is predictable that the higher the level, the fewer the players), below 2000 we see a sudden monotonous decline! Of course, one of the explanations for this phenomenon may be that FIDE has established the lower entry barriers relatively recently, so some people just didn't have a chance to get a rating . However, it is clear that this reason is by far not the main one. More likely is that FIDE is simply not efficient enough in holding rated events for amateurs and motivating them to participate.
Comments (5)
1. Written by
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
on 21:03 10 2010 .
Selfish organisation!
2. Written by Konstantin on 00:38 11 2010 .
Of course.
Of course FIDE is being elitist - and I like it that way, thank you very much. Everyone and their dog has a national rating - I want my FIDE rating to mean something!
3. Written by Peter on 06:23 11 2010 .
Of course.
Konstantin, you are making a very strange point. Ratings mean something when they can be compared. Otherwise let's imagine a situation: - I've got a rating of X FIDE (your statement) - What is FIDE and how much is that? (someone asks in return)
This way you won't have a chance to show off your skills. Well, of course, there are some people who will give you credit for having ANY FIDE rating, but then what's the difference between you and a 1200? He also has a rating...
4. Written by
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
on 19:50 11 2010 .
none
here you are spot-on, rated events are unhead of in Africa. young up coming players yearn to have ratings, but the events are not anywhere in there vicinity. The only chance is the olympiad which is so competitive and not many qualify. The continental event admits few players, so what else, many give up chess after not knowing how well they [play the nobal game.
whether it is FIDE or local federations, surely, something is wrong somewhere
5. Written by
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
on 04:19 13 2010 .
What about Kramnik?
Did you put only the current Elo right? Because Kramnik was +2800 too.
It is interesting this table, but i think that the "average" is at 2000-2099 Elo because the country's organization.For example, Im mexican and here almost no ranked tournaments and if there are, are only in the capital or important cities and the people have to travel and spends lot of money in food, hotel, tickets, registration...sooooo, being a GM is expensive(money, not consider the effort). And if i want a rating, i must to have an initial +2200, because if my initial is 1600, 1800, believe me, go up is veeeeery difficult. I think that in other countries is better and of course not better jeje Consider, also, that so many of these tournaments are in working days, and the "normal" people wont adventure and lose their permanent jobs. Ok, i only said my opinion and of course this is not your fault Natalia, I'm not complaining about you jeje dont angry, eh, please. >_