To answer this tricky question, we will review the schedules of the very best chess players in the world. While in general copying the training routine of a top grandmaster is unreasonable for less proficient players, here the situation is somewhat different. The world is not perfect, so most amateurs simply can’t afford to allocate too much time for tournament play. On the other hand, non-elite grandmasters often have to flock from one event to another to earn a decent amount of money. Naturally, neither of these cases is optimal. That’s why we will be looking at top pros: they are supposed to know this as no one else does, and have the opportunity to choose the amount of games that suits them best.

First of all, here’s the September 1, 2010 top-20. Next to each name you can see how many rated games the person has played in 2009:
 

1. Carlsen – 75

2. Topalov – 41

3. Anand – 25

4. Aronian – 93

5. Kramnik – 26

6. Eljanov – 86

7. Grischuk – 55

8. Mamedyarov – 69

9. Ivanchuk – 135

10. Gelfand – 96

11. Ponomariov – 42

12. Shirov – 93

13. Radjabov – 60

14. Karjakin – 69

15. Nakamura – 86

16. Wang – 83

17. Svidler – 114

18. Adams – 74

19. Jakovenko – 71

20. Malakhov – 84

Now let’s sort the list by number of games per year to make it more expressive:
 

1. Ivanchuk – 135 (well-known chess addict)
2. Svidler – 114 (admitted being tired, but couldn’t miss some important events)
3. Gelfand – 96
4. Aronian – 93
5. Shirov – 93
6. Eljanov – 86
7. Nakamura – 86
8. Malakhov – 84
9. Wang – 83
10. Carlsen – 75 (median number)
11. Adams – 74 (median number)
12. Jakovenko – 71
13. Mamedyarov – 69
14. Karjakin – 69
15. Radjabov – 60
16. Grischuk – 55
17. Ponomariov – 42 (doesn’t play a lot after becoming FIDE ex-World Champion in 2004)
18. Topalov – 41 (was busy preparing for the WC match against Anand)
19. Kramnik – 26 (always acts like he’s preparing for a WC match)
20. Anand – 25 (was busy preparing for the WC match against Topalov)

It’s easy to see that the median number for elite grandmasters is 74-75 games per year (ironically, by doing so we get Magnus Carlsen, the highest-rated player in the world, as a role model in this respect). This should be close to the optimal amount of games/year for a person who takes chess seriously. However, it is essential to remember that this list doesn’t include rapid/blitz/blind/exhibition events, training games; doesn’t reflect the time spent on studying chess and analyzing one’s games. To become an eminent player, one should keep in mind all the intricacies of the training process, not only one feature.

Warning: this article should serve as food for thought, not a medical prescription stating that “you won’t improve unless you play X games a year.”

In case someone is interested in my chess schedule, it normally includes about 90 rated games per year. The end of 2010 is going to be especially busy since upcoming are the Women’s World Blitz Championship (unrated), World Chess Olympiad, European Club Championship, Russian Superfinal, Women’s World Championship and (maybe) ACP Rapid World Championship (unrated).
 

Meanwhile, let’s take a look at another game from the recent Russia – China friendly match:
 

	1. Written by Luigi on 09:12 07 ñåíòÿáðÿ 2010 ã.
	Very interesting!

	2. Written by Luigi on 09:16 07 ñåíòÿáðÿ 2010 ã.
	And, yep, the next months will be very busy for women chess players!

	3. Written by This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it on 21:22 19 ñåíòÿáðÿ 2010 ã.
	Question Natalia, I will make you a question and please answer me, ok?    If you remembre me, I have told you that I am a 2200 player aprox.  Often I have final positions like yours in this game (of course at my level), where I have a minimal advantage, and the initiative, and a better position...and the result is also a draw by three-move-repetition, or an offer.  I thought that for a Grand Master it was more "easy" to play for winning, but...  grandmasters also have this trouble?

	4. Written by Natalia on 13:07 20 ñåíòÿáðÿ 2010 ã.
	Question Joel, grandmasters are also humans. Even the very top guys (like Anand or Kramnik) can't convert a won position from time to time, not to mention a slight advantage. http://pogonina.com

	5. Written by This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it on 23:01 26 èþëÿ 2012 ã.
	zUkRONsgWfKKTrudD This is just the perfect awnser for all of us http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100003406344541

Write Comment

Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:
Comment:
Code:*